The decisive development
The Supreme Court agreed to review the Trump administration’s mandatory-detention policy, which denies bond hearings to some immigrants as removal cases proceed.
The Court’s decision to hear the case puts the administration’s expanded mandatory-detention policy on a path to a definitive national ruling after lower courts divided over its legality.
The Supreme Court agreed to review the Trump administration’s mandatory-detention policy, which denies bond hearings to some immigrants as removal cases proceed. The administration says the policy is permitted by immigration law; lower federal appeals courts have split over that reading. The Court did not decide the legality of the policy today. But it will now answer a question with immediate consequences for who can be held without a bond hearing and for how much latitude immigration agencies have to reinterpret detention law.
The Court’s decision to hear the case puts the administration’s expanded mandatory-detention policy on a path to a definitive national ruling after lower courts divided over its legality.
The Supreme Court agreed to review the Trump administration’s mandatory-detention policy, which denies bond hearings to some immigrants as removal cases proceed.
A policy fight over bond hearings is becoming a Supreme Court fight over the reach of detention.
The Court has not endorsed the policy; it has made its reach the next question.
The Court has not endorsed the policy; it has made its reach the next question.
Primary evidence first. Reporting second. Inference labeled.