The decisive development
Wednesday’s U.S.-Saudi strikes in Iraq were supposed to signal a tougher response to Iran-backed attacks.
Iranian strikes hit Kuwait and were intercepted over Jordan as the U.S. launched a heavy new wave inside Iran; drone fires at Egypt’s Damietta port showed the conflict is now testing the region’s supposed buffers.
Wednesday’s U.S.-Saudi strikes in Iraq were supposed to signal a tougher response to Iran-backed attacks. By Thursday, the consequences had moved well beyond Iraq. Kuwait said an Iranian strike killed a worker at a Chinese company’s building, while Jordan intercepted missiles for a second straight day. The U.S. then said it struck dozens of Revolutionary Guard command, missile, drone and coastal-defense targets inside Iran. Separately, drone strikes set fires on two natural-gas vessels at Egypt’s Damietta port. Responsibility for the port attack remains unresolved, but the pattern is clear: the war is no longer only a contest over Iran, Iraq and Hormuz. It is putting the countries and facilities meant to stabilize the region directly in the line of fire.
Iranian strikes hit Kuwait and were intercepted over Jordan as the U.S. launched a heavy new wave inside Iran; drone fires at Egypt’s Damietta port showed the conflict is now testing the region’s supposed buffers.
Wednesday’s U.S.-Saudi strikes in Iraq were supposed to signal a tougher response to Iran-backed attacks.
The conflict’s new danger is not merely escalation between Washington and Tehran, but the failure of the regional buffer states to stay buffered.
A war becomes harder to end when every country asked to contain it starts absorbing the blast.
A war becomes harder to end when every country asked to contain it starts absorbing the blast.
Primary evidence first. Reporting second. Inference labeled.